What VAERG does.
VAERG provides a structured commercial decision layer across the investment lifecycle. Outputs are produced in fixed sections and built to withstand Investment Committee scrutiny. The analysis isolates what is defensible, what is conditional, and what is illusion, without drifting into execution planning or management advice.
1. Commercial screening. (24 hours turnaround)
Most cases enter deeper diligence without anyone first testing whether the case is commercially underwriteable at all. Commercial Screening separates structurally sound economics from narratives with hidden blockers. It is not full underwriting. It is an IC-gate.
Input is IM, teaser, or pitch material.
The output delivers a commercial verdict (proceed, conditional, or high risk) before resources are committed. It identifies the reality gap between narrative and substance, maps the structural risks most likely to kill the deal, and defines what can and cannot be underwritten without further data. Every screening includes a base case, a break case, and a verification agenda specifying what to confirm and what data to request before the case advances.
2. Commercial due diligence. (3–5 days)
CDD determines the credible value envelope and identifies where the investment case breaks. It replaces narrative assumptions with structured commercial logic, built for decisions made under incomplete data and seller-driven narratives.
Input is the Information Memorandum, management materials, and aggregated revenue splits.
The output delivers executive commercial framing focused on economic logic, with IC implications for valuation and bid structure. It assesses pricing power, margin quality, revenue durability, and elasticity risk. A scenario framework maps alternative outcomes with explicit breakpoints showing where the valuation becomes indefensible. The verification agenda identifies priority questions for management and data requirements to resolve before signing.
3. Commercial value audit. (5–10 days)
CVA replaces assumptions with empirical evidence by analysing observed transaction behaviour. The objective is to quantify evidence-based EBITDA potential and identify exactly where value and risk reside. Most value plans fail not on ambition but because the economics were never validated at transaction level.
Input is invoice-level transaction data, customer and product masters, pricing history, discount structures, and selected contract samples.
The output delivers a full EBITDA value bridge, pricing architecture reconstruction, customer- and product-level economics, harmonisation potential, indexation reality, elasticity risk, and a commercial risk map. The addressable value inventory provides a complete map of where value sits, without prioritisation.